From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?b?QW5kcsOhcw==?= Major Subject: Re: Bug: :noexport: tag prevents table functioning as babel code block input [7.7 (release_7.7.167.gfceb)] Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <80mxf0gyi3.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60347) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvpJq-00076D-Np for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:38:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvpJp-0000Su-Ku for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:38:58 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:60965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvpJp-0000Sg-Fh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:38:57 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QvpJn-0001LB-8F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:38:55 +0200 Received: from dslb-092-074-177-167.pools.arcor-ip.net ([92.74.177.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:38:55 +0200 Received: from andras.g.major by dslb-092-074-177-167.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:38:55 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Sebastian, > I will let answer the ones who decide on such things. Though, I am amazed you > put a tag on the table itself. > > I'd have expected the noexport tag to be on a section containing the table. I forgot to mention in the report that of course I tried that too: if I place the table and the code in two sections and tag the section containing the table with :noexport:, the result is exactly the same. Omitting the tag makes it work again. > So, my extra question (to the same persons) is: is this an allowed use of a > tag? Or just an undocumented feature which temporarily works? -- euh, or not > even works, in fact... In my little experience, it work, and I think it's a desirable feature too. I'm not really keen on creating a section for a table just so that I can hide it. András