From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Subject: Re: Table formula changes are not always necessary when moving rows Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 18:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <66C13CBC-3933-4F01-BADB-AA9CB42C16C3@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45409 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PwfKB-0006JW-4i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:38:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PwfKA-0002YD-6G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:38:31 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PwfK9-0002Xx-UP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:38:30 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PwfK6-0008Of-1k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:38:26 +0100 Received: from 94-21-239-229.pool.digikabel.hu ([94.21.239.229]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:38:26 +0100 Received: from adatgyujto by 94-21-239-229.pool.digikabel.hu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:38:26 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik gmail.com> writes: > You did not show your example, but from the > formula I would assume that you start the table immediately > with data, without a header line org a horizontal separator line. > If you did, you could do vsum(@I..II) and have a formula that is > stable against row switches. > No, I do have a header and separator lines in the table I only simplified the formula for the sake of the example. But I didn't know about this @I syntax. It looks like I can use it to specify the formulas relative to separator lines in the table, so it probably solves the problem. Thanks.