From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Sexton Subject: Re: OrgmodeWiki Support Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <200912062323.35140.liste@barisch.com> <20091218112849.GH5666@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <6AB8487A-888D-440D-8A8E-C0BB63050F2C@gmail.com> <20091218141926.GA23267@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NLjYo-0005kn-1R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:36:26 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NLjYj-0005fG-Sw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:36:25 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35425 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NLjYj-0005f1-N7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:36:21 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55603) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NLjYj-0004HT-AX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:36:21 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NLjYe-00009R-Uo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:36:17 +0100 Received: from ip-118-90-78-70.xdsl.xnet.co.nz ([118.90.78.70]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:36:16 +0100 Received: from psexton by ip-118-90-78-70.xdsl.xnet.co.nz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:36:16 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik gmail.com> writes: [snip] > > I think it would be useful to discuss this proposal first in a broader > sense. > Let me try to make a start. > > A few days ago, Paul Sexton submitted his proposal for simple > file-to-file links based on etags. > > He wanted to make [[sometext]] be a link to <> where > the target definition <> can be in a different file. > Furthermore, his proposal uses an external program to do the > indexing of the tags, and following the links uses the etags > code shipped with Emacs. > > Finally, Paul's proposal also contains a way to automatically > create new topics when a link is called that does not yet have > a target. > > Now we are talking about WikiWords, or CamelCase links. Here the > idea is that any such mixed-case word automatically is treated as a > link. > Traditionally these links to a separate file with name given by the > link text directly. But I suppose it could also got to a <> > somewhere in a file? > > For a couple of reasons it seems to me that it would be useful > to look at these proposals together. For one thing, I am not > a huge fan of the zillions of files that will be created when using > the one-file-per-word approach. Since Org-mode is outline based, it > seem to make a lot of sense to have many topics per file. > > One way to move into this direction would be to still use etags > to index the possible targets, and then to turn specific words > (like CamelCase words) directly into links without the need to > surround them with [[...]]. > > But of course, we could also have an implementation as Adam > proposes it, with CamelCase words linking to files, and > then [[target]] linking to targets. > > Can we discuss this for a bit? > > - Carsten Hi Carsten, In the other thread, you say you have implemented a hook whose function(s) are run when attempting to open a link. From your description it sounds like the hook is run FIRST, and org's default behaviour only happens if the hook functions don't override it. However, both the link-to-file-of-same-name proposal and my etags functionality would be more easily implemented with a hook function that is called only when org can't find a specific target for [[plain link]]. At the moment org defaults to performing a full-text search for "plain link". Both the wikiwords and the etags behaviours need to happen instead of that default behaviour, but neither needs to override the rest of org's link-opening behaviour. Re the WikiWords idea -- this could be done in 2 independent parts: 1. Option to tell org to interpret all CamelCase words as plain links (this might be behaviour that some people want by itself) 2. Function, called when org can't find target for plain link, that tries to open and visit a file with the same name as the link. I think a hook to change the default behaviour of org when it can't find an explicit target for a plain link is a very good idea and would probably lead to other useful stuff. Personally I don't find the default behaviour of full-text search to be useful. Paul P.S. My wishlist includes using a different colour to fontify links whose targets don't exist (a la wikipedia with its undefined links in red). Can be done, but not sure how to do it efficiently.