From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: [PATCH] Display a count of items next to each list (or block) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:34:06 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86d2nwhdda.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VP65l-0007bk-43 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 03:34:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VP65d-0004KE-Fx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 03:34:29 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VP65d-0004Jy-90 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 03:34:21 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VP65a-0001PE-J2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:34:18 +0200 Received: from p578f1e9c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.143.30.156]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:34:18 +0200 Received: from Stromeko by p578f1e9c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:34:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86d2nwhdda.fsf@somewhere.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Am 25.09.2013 22:09, schrieb Sebastien Vauban: > In order to make Org much nicer to use, I felt we missed a count of items next > to the lists (or blocks, for multi-block agenda views). Here is a patch to add > this, depending on the new variable `org-agenda-display-count-of-items' > (enabled by default). Minor nit: to my ears "item count" sounds better than "count of items". Achim.