From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: [RFC] Org version of the Org manual Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 08:32:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87r4jeqq0i.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87620k79fo.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip4j5xb8.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3ozwb6x.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38371) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJIwY-0002Ig-AH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 03:32:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJIwW-0007lZ-Rs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 03:32:46 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJIwW-0007lL-LI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 03:32:44 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UJIwq-0002r0-V8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 08:33:04 +0100 Received: from p578f1d49.dip.t-dialin.net ([87.143.29.73]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 08:33:04 +0100 Received: from Stromeko by p578f1d49.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 08:33:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k3ozwb6x.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Am 22.03.2013 19:17, schrieb Nicolas Goaziou: >> You might want to use the (function (lambda ...)) form. > > Why? (function (lambda ...)) is equivalent to (lambda ...). In fact, > `lambda' uses `function' as a subroutine. http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Anonymous-Functions.html http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1852844/emacs-lisp-difference-between-function-lambda-and-lambda With Emacs 24.3 and eager macro expoansion the need to do this has diminished, but for the benefit of older Emacsen we should probably continue the practise. > That's why I also suggest to drop the (mapcar 'org-trim ...) wrapper. > There's no reason to remove blanks if the user inserted them in the > first place. Oh, OK - I did not realise that. > Since that's not costly to achieve, there no real reason not to support > it. I'll trust you on the "not costly" part, I can't do any experiment right now. > So, any objection (or further comment) for that change? Please go ahead. Regards, -- Achim. (on the road :-)