From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: Bug: with option hidestars to be hidden stars are on white backround on block terminal [7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-882-gf47a71 @ /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/)] Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:38:31 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87d2xu8fjq.fsf@boo.workgroup> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tob4w-000249-Bo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:38:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tob4v-00026N-0T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:38:30 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tob4u-00026I-Pt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:38:28 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tob56-0006xR-As for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:38:40 +0100 Received: from p578f1006.dip.t-dialin.net ([87.143.16.6]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:38:40 +0100 Received: from Stromeko by p578f1006.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:38:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87d2xu8fjq.fsf@boo.workgroup> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Am 28.12.2012 14:36, schrieb Gregor Zattler: > I use option `hidestars' and Emacs/org-mode on a terminal with > black background. Since a few days the superflous stars are not > hidden any more but shown on a white background. This makes them > stand out very much. I don't see how this change is related since it changes the foreground, not the background. What do the following things return if you eval them in the org buffer (with M-: since they are not interactive): (face-background 'default nil 'default) (face-foreground 'default nil 'default) (face-background 'org-hide nil 'default) (face-foreground 'org-hide nil 'default) -- Achim. (on the road :-)