From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard G Riley Subject: Re: org-publish Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:42:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KF9uS-0000iE-B7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:42:48 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KF9uQ-0000hA-B6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:42:47 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34021 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KF9uQ-0000h4-3i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:42:46 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]:30363) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KF9uP-0000da-PA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:42:46 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so568966fgb.30 for ; Sat, 05 Jul 2008 08:42:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Sat, 5 Jul 2008 08:30:39 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: org-mode , Richard G Riley Carsten Dominik writes: > On Jul 4, 2008, at 8:28 AM, Richard G Riley wrote: > >> >> I would like to suggest that >> >> C-c C-e P "Publish the project containing the current file." also >> publishes any projects which contain that project. e.g I have a >> "container project" >> >> ("cv" >> :components ("cv-html" "cv-raw") >> ) >> >> This would mean one doesn't have to manually select org-publish and >> then >> enter "cv" to publish the entire project. One can do it using hot keys >> from any file within cv-html or cv-raw. > > But if you have changed only a file in a sub project, what is the need > for publishing the container? > > - Carsten But what if I have changed more than one file? Which (in my case is typical). Since the timestamps are now working better there is no real transfer overhead.