From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Richard Subject: Re: Yearly repeats on the agenda Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 16:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1890.1334665342@alphaville> <877gxawoyd.fsf@altern.org> <11939.1334927830@alphaville> <874nrqzrut.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36547) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SS5xI-0002u1-4Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 08:25:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SS5xF-0003tX-JJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 08:25:19 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SS5xF-0003tF-CN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 08:25:17 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SS5x6-0004fP-Eb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 14:25:08 +0200 Received: from geodiff-mac3.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.131.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 14:25:08 +0200 Received: from theonewiththeevillook by geodiff-mac3.ulb.ac.be with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 14:25:08 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Le Tue, 08 May 2012 16:10:02 +0200, Bastien a écrit : > Nick Dokos writes: > >> Oh, I agree - the removal is certainly desirable. I meant whether the >> non-removal of not-today's date is intentional :-) > > Thinking about this again, I don't see any reason why we should keep any > timestamp in the headline. I pushed a fix for this. Hello, PMJI, but I often used to construct headlines such as * Some course (or any other kind of recurring meeting) ** <2012-05-08 mar.> ** <2012-05-15 mar.> ** <2012-05-22 mar.> and then filling the level two headlines as I attend the lectures. This situation sometimes creates an error message when building the agenda view, so now I use * Some course ** Lecture <2012-05-08 mar.> ** Lecture <2012-05-15 mar.> ** Lecture <2012-05-22 mar.> I understand from your post that this way of doing things should be avoided, right ? What would be the "correct way" ? I guess I could do something like : * Some course <2012-05-08 mar.> <2012-05-15 mar.> <2012-05-22 mar.> and create headlines for each lecture as I attend them. Best wishes, -- Nico.