From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Egli Subject: Re: Release 6.28 Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:26:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <697A2093-E226-4AD6-B7DE-21A2DA8208A6@gmail.com> <7AC3F553-5E38-42A3-8761-EE44AE69D51B@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MLx1r-0002SL-Nm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:27:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MLx1m-0002Pe-S1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:27:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39006 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MLx1m-0002PW-MD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:26:58 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:41633 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MLx1m-0001rq-5p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:26:58 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MLx1i-0005sW-8f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:26:54 +0000 Received: from d05.sbs-online.ch ([217.192.14.190]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:26:54 +0000 Received: from christian.egli by d05.sbs-online.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:26:54 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi all Carsten Dominik writes: > On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Ulf Stegemann wrote: >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> Bulk action >>> ============ >>> >>> We can add more actions, if you convince me they make sense. >> >> IMHO setting scheduled (and maybe deadline) date would make sense. > > In what sense? Shifting all dates by the same amount, or setting them > all to a fixed date? I usually display unscheduled TODO items in my agenda as well (org-agenda-include-all-todo), so if I decide that I should work on some of them next week then a bulk action to schedule them might come in handy. So one use case is to set a fixed scheduled date for a number of TODOs. In my case these are tasks that have not been scheduled yet. Another use case is when I decide that there will not be enough time this week to complete all scheduled tasks. I want to move some of the tasks to next week. This could be either a shift by 7 days or a rescheduling to next monday (a fixed date). Thanks Christian