From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Riley Subject: Re: problems with crypt/reveal (org-mobile related?) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:39:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <878vwga1ch.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54810 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzXHo-000503-D6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:39:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzXHm-0003q2-Qt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:39:55 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46389) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzXHm-0003pi-HV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:39:54 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzXHl-0006rl-Qm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:39:53 +0100 Received: from 85.183.18.158 ([85.183.18.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:39:53 +0100 Received: from rileyrg by 85.183.18.158 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:39:53 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Richard Riley writes: > Julien Danjou writes: > >> On Tue, Mar 15 2011, Richard Riley wrote: >> >>> How now to reveal the "embedded" pgp message? org-reveal doesnt see this >>> pgp part as encrypted. >> >> M-x org-decrypt-entry >> ? > > That doesnt work as the bit encrypted is not the "entry" its part of the > entry. > > I could just set it at another level I guess. > If someone could provide some sort of patch for org-reveal to recognise gpg encrypted paragraphs in that same crypt entry and decode it too that would be great. I have literally hundreds of org entries affected by this. See the OP for examples.