eric, this looks great -- On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Eric Schulte wrote: > > Setup > > org-mime exposes two functions > `org-mime-htmlize' can be called from within a mail composition buffer to > export either the entire buffer or just the active region to html, and embed > the results into the buffer as a text/html mime section. > > org-mime-htmlize is an interactive Lisp function in `org-mime.el'. > > (org-mime-htmlize ARG) > > Export a portion of an email body composed using `mml-mode' to > html using `org-mode'. If called with an active region only > export that region, otherwise export the entire body. > > `org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize' can be called from within an Org-mode > buffer to export either the whole buffer or the narrowed subtree or active > region to HTML, and open a new email buffer including the resulting HTML > content as an embedded mime section. > > org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize is an interactive Lisp function in > `org-mime.el'. > > (org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize) > > Export the current org-mode buffer to HTML using > `org-export-as-html' and package the results into an email > handling with appropriate MIME encoding. > > The following key bindings are suggested, which bind the C-c M-o key > sequence to the appropriate org-mime function in both email and Org-mode > buffers. > > (add-hook 'message-mode-hook > (lambda () > (local-set-key "\C-c\M-o" 'org-mime-htmlize))) > (add-hook 'org-mode-hook > (lambda () > (local-set-key "\C-c\M-o" 'org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize))) > > Just quickly -- so if I'm using wanderlust, will the resultant message still be properly formatted? I remember there was some discussion about the separation syntax in different mailers but don'tremember how it turned out. thanks for this -- man, does it look good in html! matt