From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Heller Subject: Re: Scheduling of 2-day events Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:51:43 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87vdh7sida.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NArVl-0001y5-C5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:52:21 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NArVg-0001xD-Kq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:52:20 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60920 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NArVg-0001xA-Co for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:52:16 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:47761) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NArVf-0000sA-TZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:52:16 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NArVd-0007UU-Hd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:52:13 +0100 Received: from mail.cdrd.ca ([142.103.191.98]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:52:13 +0100 Received: from hellerm2 by mail.cdrd.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:52:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87vdh7sida.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bernt Hansen wrote: > Markus Heller writes: > >> Hello, >> >> subject says it all. Is this the appropriate way of doing scheduling >> a 2-day event (couldn't find an example in the manual): >> >> * TODO Career/Training/Courses >> ** TODO Project Management Workshop >> SCHEDULED: <2009-11-19 Thu 9:00-16:30>--<2009-11-20 Fri 9:00-16:30> >> >> >> The agenda out put (C-c a a) looks like this: >> >> Thursday 19 November 2009 >> ABC: 9:00-16:30 Scheduled: TODO Project Management Workshop >> ABC: 9:00-16:30 (1/2): TODO Project Management Workshop >> Friday 20 November 2009 >> ABC: (2/2): TODO Project Management Workshop > > I would just drop the SCHEDULED: part > > ** TODO Project Management Workshop > <2009-11-19 Thu 9:00-16:30>--<2009-11-20 Fri 9:00-16:30> > > so you don't get a duplicate entry. I'd also drop the TODO since it's > scheduled for a block of time and when the time is gone it's done - > whether you mark it DONE or not. Thanks for your reply, Bernt. The TODO changes to STARTED when I clock this task in, which I do when I'm working on my preparation. I could have a sub-task for preparation and clock this, but in the end, this doesn't really matter too much to me. Cheers Markus