From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Richard G Riley <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: relative scheduling
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:22:33 +0200
Message-ID: <grwstts0cm.fsf@home.net>
References: <3jve9n6oxf.fsf@home.net>
	<29178d4ffee1d1d7a249c67ca0592b65@science.uva.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ig7MZ-0002SO-7n
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:22:43 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ig7MW-0002SC-PP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:22:41 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ig7MW-0002S9-Jo
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:22:40 -0400
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com>) id 1Ig7MW-0003PW-8m
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:22:40 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so644488nfh
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <29178d4ffee1d1d7a249c67ca0592b65@science.uva.nl> (Carsten
	Dominik's message of "Tue\, 9 Oct 2007 18\:09\:08 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Cc: org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Richard G Riley <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com>

Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:

> On Oct 4, 2007, at 14:32, Richard G Riley wrote:
>
>>
>> Should something +3d work when rescheduling a task? It would be nice if
>> it did and be a little more consistent IMO.
>
> Yes, it would be more consistent so I will do this.
>
> However, a different question pops up here.  When rescheduling,
> should the +Nd be relative to today, or relative to
> the currently scheduled date?
>
> - A good reason to make it relative to today is that you might not
>   always know that the entry is already scheduled.  Using today
>   as reference would be safe
>
> - A good reason for doing it relative to the scheduled date is
>   that you are *re*-scheduling, and then it is a bit more
>   logical to think "lets push this two days down"
>
> Votes?
>
> - Carsten

for me, always relative to today.