From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@diplan.de>
Subject: Re: FR: Using properties to customize global settings on a per-entry
 basis
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:28:45 +0200
Message-ID: <fe5alt$d9c$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <m2odfm6sfq.fsf@newartisans.com>	<93a9124009e1ee0ce55829e44bf3a878@science.uva.nl>	<m2d4vwaxo1.fsf@newartisans.com>	<f593b5c12d3ab522944380546c816ce3@science.uva.nl>	<87fy0ri1dq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>	<9cc854bff9d3fff72a5a9f7ed87235de@science.uva.nl>
	<87prztyd2m.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IdmJ2-0002yx-7l
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:29:24 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IdmJ1-0002yi-J2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:29:23 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IdmJ1-0002yf-CL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:29:23 -0400
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1IdmJ0-0006vn-Sl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:29:23 -0400
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IdmIn-0005Nh-NW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:29:09 +0000
Received: from 212.34.176.74 ([212.34.176.74])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:29:09 +0000
Received: from rainer.stengele by 212.34.176.74 with local (Gmexim 0.1
	(Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:29:09 +0000
In-Reply-To: <87prztyd2m.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien schrieb:
> Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:
> 
>>> I think using LOGGING is a bit better.
>> So what do I do?  More votes?
>>
>>> | logging          | record a timestamp when an item is marked DONE
>>> | nologging        | don't record when items are marked DONE
>>> | lognotedone      | record timestamp and a note when DONE
>>> | lognotestate     | record timestamp and a note when TODO state
>>> | logrepeat        | record a note when re-instating a repeating item
>>> | nologrepeat      | do not record when re-instating repeating item
>>> | lognoteclock-out | record timestamp and a note when clocking out
> 
> Well.. if we can access all these options thru a single :LOGGING:
> property, that's another argument for it, no? For instance, using a
> property :org-log-done: wouldn't let us use nologrepeat, for example.
> 

I'd also like to vote for :LOGGING:

rainer