From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] hline references on left side of table formula
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:40:13 -0500
Message-ID: <f4a55d2d787bbb714175947bf42dc8dc@mail.rickster.com>
References: <2027056056.183911380605538292.JavaMail.www@wwinf7113>
	<874n7pgawr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<39f042b047fcc17e87f5ceb8ebd3e038@mail.rickster.com>
	<CALn3zoh6K6hS7Q0-0qS1twCv1FYsEocDBr+tp68=Ukn06J0S0A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44114)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1VeQks-0003rK-Jo
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:40:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1VeQkn-0001Wd-KA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:40:18 -0500
Received: from [204.62.15.78] (port=55691 helo=mail.rickster.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1VeQkn-0001WX-HT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:40:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CALn3zoh6K6hS7Q0-0qS1twCv1FYsEocDBr+tp68=Ukn06J0S0A@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 2013-11-07 00:59, Michael Brand wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com> wrote:
> +                  (not (string-match "\.\.@" (car x))))
> 
> This would be the same as
> 
> +                  (not (string-match "..@" (car x))))
> 
> but you meant
> 
> +                  (not (string-match "\\.\\.@" (car x))))
> 

Of course, you are right.

rick