From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] export to various flavors of (X)HTML
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:37:51 -0400
Message-ID: <ed0b8ebcdddfee0e95f4e2ac53fdda17@mail.rickster.com>
References: <878v4elu5h.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56119)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1UTDNu-0003aU-MZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:38:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1UTDNn-0004R6-VR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:37:58 -0400
Received: from [204.62.15.78] (port=59785 helo=mail.rickster.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1UTDNn-0004Ql-Sq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:37:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <878v4elu5h.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 19.04.2013 05:57, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> I'm starting a new thread for this since the previous discussion was
> buried in with something tangential.

> I'm not proud of some of the implementation (self-closing vs
> non-self-closing tags are ugly, and I wish org-html-html5-p and
> org-html-xhtml-p were variables, not functions), but there it is, it
> seems to work.
>
> If this is deemed okay I'll send a version of the patch with a proper
> commit message, and also updated documentation.

I disagree with the minimized closing patch change.

All versions of html accept the " />" idiom (with the extra space so 
that html4 only browsers
don't break) for minimized tags (also "></{elem}", e.g. "<hr></hr>" is,
i believe, always valid). html5 certainly accepts valid xhtml as input. 
It would entirely break e.g, nxml-mode or xsl post-processing to make 
this change.

Other things that don't need to be removed for html5:

    - CDATA escapes
    - xmns: .. xml:lang declarations (as long as you keep the html valid 
xml)


As a positive side effect, backing out these changes would simplify the 
patch a lot :)


The doctype (and fix to the text/javascript closing tag) changes look 
great.

rick