From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: meingbg Subject: Re: Clean Org Clock with step Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:26:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ljmfbaxe.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1647636973==" Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MULjY-00080O-SK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:26:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MULjU-0007zP-BS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:26:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42182 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MULjU-0007zM-6I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:26:48 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com ([209.85.219.228]:44725) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MULjT-0006Nl-PI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:26:48 -0400 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so848778ewy.42 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 07:26:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ljmfbaxe.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --===============1647636973== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c3ccad54990046f746415 --0015174c3ccad54990046f746415 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thank you, this one would save my eyes a bit! Just looking at the output, maybe this could be implemented as a regexp replace on the entire block performed after putting together the tables? Just thinking it might save you some headache, if you don't think it's too ugly of a hack. And while I'm at it - my employer requires me to report not only what I'm doing and how long it takes, but also when I'm doing it. I assume most people wouldn't benefit from a feature like this, and that there are many other things on the wish list with higher priority, so I'm just asking if someone could point out an API guide or something like that, it would be wonderful. Thanks again! //meingbg On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Bastien wrote: > meingbg writes: > > > When using the :step day option in the clocktable, every day gets it's > own > > table. This is a great option! It can however easily be a lot of tables, > even > > if there's not too much information. Say for example there are only items > in > > two out of thirty tables. > > > > Is there an option to show only non-empty tables? If not, would it be a > good > > idea to add such an option? > > Yes, I think it would be a good idea. > > I've been looking into the code for this, but this is not trivial. > I let Carsten sort this out :) > > -- > Bastien > --0015174c3ccad54990046f746415 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you, this one would save my eyes a bit!

Just looking at the output, maybe this could be implemented as a regexp replace on the entire block performed after putting together the tables? Just thinking it might save you some headache, if you don't think it's too ugly of a hack.

And while I'm at it - my employer requires me to report not only what I'm doing and how long it takes, but also when I'm doing it. I assu= me most people wouldn't benefit from a feature like this, and that there are many other things on the wish list with higher priority, so I'm jus= t asking if someone could point out an API guide or something like that, it= would be wonderful.

Thanks again!

//meingbg

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Bastien <bastienguerry@googlemail.com> wrote:
meingbg <meingbg@= gmail.com> writes:

> When using the :step day option in the clocktable, every day gets it&#= 39;s own
> table. This is a great option! It can however easily be a lot of table= s, even
> if there's not too much information. Say for example there are onl= y items in
> two out of thirty tables.
>
> Is there an option to show only non-empty tables? If not, would it be = a good
> idea to add such an option?

Yes, I think it would be a good idea.

I've been looking into the code for this, but this is not trivial.
I let Carsten sort this out :)

--
=A0Bastien

--0015174c3ccad54990046f746415-- --===============1647636973== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============1647636973==--