From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manish Subject: Re: Question about tracking TODO state changes and M-S-ENTER Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:48:41 +0530 Message-ID: References: <4A17321F.7040806@oneroad.com> <3EBA2E79-B1BD-482D-A925-89DAB32A572F@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M8xUo-0000N1-66 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 10:19:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M8xUj-0000LK-3h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 10:19:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43695 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M8xUi-0000Kz-ST for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 10:19:08 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f107.google.com ([209.85.222.107]:49183) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M8xUi-00008v-8q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 10:19:08 -0400 Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so3926601pzk.14 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 07:19:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3EBA2E79-B1BD-482D-A925-89DAB32A572F@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Keith Swartz , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On May 26, 2009, at 10:23 AM, Manish wrote: > >> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Keith Swartz wrote: >>> >>> I'm using org-mode 6.25e right now, and I've turned on the functionality to >>> track todo state changes. If I create a list item (M-ENTER) and then change >>> it to a TODO (C-c C-t), it correctly puts the state change in the >>> :LOGBOOK: drawer as I've configured it. >>> >>> However, if I use M-S-ENTER to combine the above two steps into one (create >>> a "TODO" item), it does NOT create an entry in the LOGBOOK for State >>> "TODO" from "" at all. Is that a bug? >> >> IMO, this is not really a state change. > > In interesting point, and something up for discussion. > > I personally am neter interesting in recording a time stamp when > first switching an item to TODO. Furthermore, for other state > changes I prefer to record a note. However, M-S-RET is really meant > for fast adding of one or more TODO entries, and being prompted for > a state change note would be really annoying here. > > Up for discussion, I am willing to install a variable here.... Well, if you make it an option then all arguments die anyways. :) Personally, I also prefer to take a note upon certain state changes. Regards, -- Manish