From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manish Subject: Re: Org-mode on Cygwin Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:55:29 +0530 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JNBbk-00023U-VD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:36:24 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JNBbi-00023I-Is for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:36:23 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JNBbi-00023F-Eh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:36:22 -0500 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.187]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JNBbQ-000231-K7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:36:22 -0500 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a20so33068tia.10 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:35:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eddward DeVilla Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > > On Feb 7, 2008 6:51 AM, Manish wrote: > > > Has anyone figured out how to use shift+arrowkeys on Cygwin Emacs? I > > am using puttycyg [1] for client. I have to use Windows Emacs just to > > use this feature of org-mode. > > > On Feb 7, 2008 11:16 PM, Eddward DeVilla wrote: > I'm not sure I understand. I use them all the time, but I don't know > what puttycyg is. I assume you aren't running emacs as a window under > the Xserver and using some terminal emulator? If so, is there a > reason you don't run it under the server? Puttycyg is a local cygwin terminal (to replace default Windows terminal) so I do not have to start an X server or run a ssh daemon. I find it more easier and natural t$ Apart from simply looking better another reason why I prefer running it inside Putty instead of X is that I can trigger it with Slickrun [1]. [1] http://www.bayden.com/SlickRun/ -- Manish