emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Clint Laskowski" <clint.laskowski@gmail.com>
To: Sven Bretfeld <sven.bretfeld@gmx.ch>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: TaskPaper and Org-Mode?
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:00:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <de5213a50803301300k414a0e98iec0a3ef1fc71d4c9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ve35wwpy.fsf@kamaloka.dhatu>

I think simplicity would be the biggest advantage. I started with
Org-Mode about six months ago and I think I've noticed an increase in
the complexity (that's probably also partly due to reading threads on
this list which, arguably, is a portal into the most complex aspects
of Org-Mode).

I need to re-think/re-consider my suggestion and articulate it more
clearly, I think!

-- Clint

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Sven Bretfeld <sven.bretfeld@gmx.ch> wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>  "Egli Christian (KIRO 433)" <christian.egli@credit-suisse.com> writes:
>
>  >> TaskPaper seems to be a really simple way of documenting tasks in text
>  >> with a GTD style. Here's an example:
>  >
>  >> I think it would be extremely useful to incorporate TaskPaper into
>  >> Org-Mode.
>  >
>  >From what I can tell Taskpaper seems to be a subset of org-mode. How
>  > would an integration  of TaskPaper look like? What features does
>  > TaskPaper have that org-mode doesn't have?
>
>  I just read through the web-description and had a short look at the
>  code of tastpaper.el. And the very same question appears to me.
>
>  The only thing I can imagine why one should prefer taskpaper.el over
>  org is its simplicity. org-mode has grown quite complex in the last
>  few months. That's an advantage, of course, but might prevent new
>  users from giving it a try. However, an integration of both modes
>  would rise the complexity.
>
>  I may be wrong. Which advantage do you see, Clint?
>
>  Greetings
>
>  Sven
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>  Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>  Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>  http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
>



-- 

-- Clint

Clint Laskowski, CISSP
clint.laskowski@gmail.com

      reply	other threads:[~2008-03-30 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-27 12:58 TaskPaper and Org-Mode? Clint Laskowski
2008-03-27 13:09 ` Egli Christian (KIRO 433)
2008-03-29 12:17   ` Sven Bretfeld
2008-03-30 20:00     ` Clint Laskowski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=de5213a50803301300k414a0e98iec0a3ef1fc71d4c9@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=clint.laskowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=sven.bretfeld@gmx.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).