From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Feature Request: org-agenda-set-category Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:44:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: <18141.23318.769156.930384@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <877in6e2fm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <18143.30554.285312.790877@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87lkbk5n5d.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wsuzx6l4.fsf@aka.i.naked.iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVi9d-0000pZ-RA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:26:21 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVi9a-0000lq-AR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:26:20 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVi9a-0000lh-4v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:26:18 -0400 Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IVi9Z-0001kD-Rn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:26:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wsuzx6l4.fsf@aka.i.naked.iki.fi> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nuutti Kotivuori Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sep 9, 2007, at 16:21, Nuutti Kotivuori wrote: > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> On Sep 6, 2007, at 7:34, Bastien wrote: >>> "T. V. Raman" writes: >>>> Could we perhaps introduce a special property that is used by >>>> org-agenda to build the left column? >>> >>> What about: >>> >>> :PROPERTIES: >>> :CATEGORY: general >>> :ARCHIVE: archives:: >>> :END: >>> >>> as a future replacement for #+CATEGORY and #+ARCHIVE? >> >> I think this is exactly how it should be - I am only >> hesitating because many people have come to rely on the other >> behavior. > > If this would mean that the category setting like this is for only > that subtree, instead of every entry after that category setting, I > support this feature immensely (same for archive ofcourse). Yes, it will be like this, but not in 5.09, wait for 5.10 for this feature. - Carsten