From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederick Giasson Subject: Re: [PATCH] New header parameter :show-process for Org-babel-clojure Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:09:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: <036bf007-5e9c-310c-5bf8-0660c1b96a5c@fgiasson.com> <87lgwrgy7z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <794c93aa-e2dc-2bfb-537e-0c89d8d34cea@fgiasson.com> <878tslp4ha.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <27089048-9dab-747f-51dc-20006717866e@fgiasson.com> <87inrlogee.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k2c0n82s.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43993) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7knI-00045j-WC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:09:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7knE-0000yj-Sm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:09:36 -0500 Received: from s052.panelboxmanager.com ([72.55.186.33]:57317) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7knE-0000xq-OW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:09:32 -0500 Received: from mailnull by s052.panelboxmanager.com with sa-checked (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1c7knC-003DAJ-3Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:09:30 -0500 Received: from modemcable199.69-130-66.mc.videotron.ca ([66.130.69.199]:55085 helo=[192.168.0.199]) by s052.panelboxmanager.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1c7knB-003D9x-SN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:09:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87k2c0n82s.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, > It looks like this warning results from a defcustom for this variable > not being included in the patch (and AFAICT it should be). Humm, I thought that it was already part of Org-mode 8.x (something I submitted a way back). Let me check that. If I have to add it again, should I recreate the commit or simply submit another patch? Thanks, Fred