From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Subject: Footnotes in image captions
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:38:26 +0530
Message-ID: <cu71t1cvqc5.fsf@systemreboot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40931)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arunisaac@hrrol>) id 1bcwGk-0005Wj-1R
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:08:41 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arunisaac@hrrol>) id 1bcwGe-0003Ec-TH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:08:36 -0400
Received: from [117.218.232.8] (port=53676 helo=hrrol)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arunisaac@hrrol>) id 1bcwGe-0003EA-9h
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:08:32 -0400
Received: from [117.192.125.238] (helo=steel)
	by hrrol with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <arunisaac@hrrol>) id 1bcwGa-0003LN-VP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:38:29 +0530
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


Footnotes in image captions are not picked up and published. Is this
intended behaviour? If it is intended behaviour, would it not be nice to
allow footnotes in image captions too?

I am using the html backend, and the following org code:

#+CAPTION: Foo [fn::bar]
[[./foo.png]]

Regards,
Arun Isaac

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXvwnrAAoJEC4l7othgCuznBkH/1/eWZVmbf8Db68wGOml1TsI
d8IENmGd5sox5xG1seAHJgAbw4IQbxx81CbaAM+kUlURXsYCPG0d3S1KNQN0GxyZ
BOsG82ZKi2ejc5hCWniekxneCGr1pviYzNCWAcWVDTNFms4aSqddJSfp2P8NVWWA
iJanmqV9rhZYxFgKyH6CbGsr/Y0Jz3XrODIYyAIr9XdgkDuLQPx9u5AhvTEqJl8Y
8oqbj4kcNH6DK2YwNxx0n/GbXxCZ9iq33aUhje1pzep304XXg5yVnEzKUsPV7G9A
dG+tfr/dbWu73vBIPq4LDeIQ7LjpCm8fF2jQ0iY1e8pLl3A1CPLapBVIZ+TCNp4=
=thHz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--