Re: Custom docbook stylesheets.

[Baoqiu Cui <cbaoqiu@yahoo.com>]

Sorry for the late reply, Dale and Carsten.

Yes, I think this patch should be a applied, as it makes things more
flexible.  (Thanks, Dale!)

The only thing missing in the patch is the docstrings of variables
org-export-docbook-xslt-proc-command and
org-export-docbook-xsl-fo-proc-command.  I'll work on that and provide a
patch soon.

Thanks,
Baoqiu


Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi
>
> Somehow I do net seem to have a patch relating to this thread.  Can you
> please send it again?  Baoqiu, you agree that this should be  applied?
>
> - Carsten
>
> On May 3, 2010, at 9:25 PM, Dale P. Smith wrote:
>
>> Baoqiu Cui <cbaoqiu@yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Dale,
>>>
>>> Dale Smith <dsmith@vtiinstruments.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Dale Smith <dsmith@vtiinstruments.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> The current org-export-docbook-xslt-proc-command is a format
>>>>>>>> string,
>>>>>>>> with a fixed order of arguments (the fo filename and then the
>>>>>>>> input
>>>>>>>> docbook filname).  Thats probably good enough for most (all?)
>>>>>>>> xslt
>>>>>>>> processors, but things may be more limited when it comes to also
>>>>>>>> specifying the stylesheet.  Do we need to have some kind of
>>>>>>>> special
>>>>>>>> markers in the format string for where the different options go?
>>>>>>>> Something like $i $o and $s (for in, out, and stysheet)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought about doing something similar to make the commands
>>>>>> easier to
>>>>>> set, but stopped pursuing that after seeing the format string
>>>>>> style
>>>>>> worked fine.  I am not sure if any other Emacs modes/packages have
>>>>>> done
>>>>>> something like this, i.e. using (semi)named arguments.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, it took me a while, but it found it.  It's the format-spec
>>>>> function. (Actually, http://edward.oconnor.cx/2009/06/format-spec
>>>>> clued me in.)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll have a go at it today and see if I can send in a patch.
>>>>
>>>> Ok.  This works for me.  Docs are not updated.  That would push me
>>>> over the 10 line limit. ;^)
>>>
>>> Thanks for working on this patch, which looks very good to me!  Yes,
>>> I
>>> think format-spec is the right way to go, and it does make the
>>> command
>>> format more flexible.
>>
>> This didn't seem to make it into org-mode.  Any chance it could be
>> added?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>  -Dale
>>
>> --
>> Dale P. Smith
>> dales@vtiinstruments.com
>> 216-447-4059 x2018
>> 216-447-8951 FAX
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
> - Carsten
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>

-- 
Baoqiu