From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baoqiu Cui Subject: Re: DocBook exporter for Org-mode Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:53:52 -0800 Message-ID: References: <18860.14549.718412.149720@muchbodyking-lm.gateway.2wire.net> <878wnmy3g8.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Leagq-00024B-1c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:54:08 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Leago-00023y-KE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:54:07 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40694 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Leago-00023v-F5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:54:06 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:36170 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Leago-0004bw-2C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:54:06 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Leagm-0002KC-CA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:54:04 +0000 Received: from nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:54:04 +0000 Received: from cbaoqiu by nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:54:04 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sebastian Rose writes: > docbook is great since it's widely used. Yes, DocBook has been adopted by many organizations in different areas in the past years. Once we have a good exporter for DocBook, we basically build a bridge for exporting Org files to all other formats. > The output looks good! > > How could we test it? > And could we configure it somehow? On how to set up a DocBook publishing environment, you can take a look at the following page: http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/ToolsSetup.html I used xsltproc + FOP before, but now I use Saxon + FOP. > Anyway, I'd prefere to export to _one_ XML format from Org-mode and > provide xslt stylesheets to translate between different formats. I totally agree! We only need one XML exporter, and I think DocBook is the way to go. Baoqiu > That way we all would concentrate on one XML exporter (e.g. the XHTML > exporter) and could provide xslt stylesheets to transform the output. > > This would guaranty a slitely more complete and bugfree export, which is > configured from one org-publish-project-alist. > > Regards, > > Sebastian > > > > Dale Smith writes: >> Baoqiu Cui writes: >> >>> The only thing that is missing (at least to me) in current Org-mode is >>> the exporter for DocBook format. >> >> There is quite a bit of similarity between org and muse formats. I've >> found that I can edit .muse files in org-mode and stiil publish to >> docbook. >> >> >>> During the last week (mainly during the last weekend), I wrote some code >>> to export Org files to DocBook V5.0 format, and everything looks very >>> promising (I have to admit that a lot of work still needs to be done to >>> make the code complete and stable) . >> >> Looks pretty good to me. I'm ready to ty it out! >> >> -Dale