From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Free `1' and `0' keys from the org-agenda interface ? Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:47:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ejfvm0s3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20071016163144.GE3018@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <87wstnkkt0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20071016173953.GB32678@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <87ve96kayj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IiBtB-0003jW-01 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:36:57 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IiBt8-0003jH-KD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:36:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IiBt8-0003jE-EZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:36:54 -0400 Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IiBt8-0003LK-3c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:36:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ve96kayj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Oct 16, 2007, at 23:26, Bastien wrote: > Adam Spiers writes: > >>> `< <' : cycle through default restricted states (see above) >> >> Hmm, that doubles the number of keypresses to achieve a given state, >> which is a bit cumbersome. But if it's customizable, who cares? :-) > > I wouldn't mind having single keys to achieve this - it's just that I > thought `1' and `0' where not the best choice. Yes, I can see that the 0 and one would be useful in other circumstances. And I don't *relly* think that a double "<" would be so bad, because don't think restricting an agenda command to a region or subtree is used frequently, is it? - Carsten