From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eddward DeVilla" Subject: Re: Re: list indentation Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:26:20 -0600 Message-ID: References: <62CB93EA-C3B9-4AA7-A8AB-FD8F52A88F81@science.uva.nl> <41c818190802091345n5a49e5f2p23f50186144c33f3@mail.gmail.com> <41c818190802091450g6226c7abp86ad56eb09e8f2b1@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JNz5V-0004lp-2z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:26:25 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JNz5R-0004ld-5A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:26:23 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JNz5R-0004la-1R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:26:21 -0500 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.235]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JNz5Q-0003Yz-PH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:26:20 -0500 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s7so3884294wxc.24 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:26:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <41c818190802091450g6226c7abp86ad56eb09e8f2b1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: William Henney Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, cezar On Feb 9, 2008 4:50 PM, William Henney wrote: > On Feb 9, 2008 4:17 PM, cezar wrote: > > I think a "terminator" would be better for the last list element. > > Something like a blank line. I am not sure, just throwing ideas around. > > But how would one distinguish a blank line that ends a list from a > blank line that separates paragraphs within a list item? > > You are right, though, that it is the end-of-list marker that is > important. On reflection, it seems to me that a beginning-of-list > marker is not necessary. That's why I suggested -----. It's really only needed as a terminator, but I like symmetry. I'd like to be able have something at the top, but it should not be required. Really, the terminator should not be required unless you need it to tell org to end the list, so we don't break current files. Edd