From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eddward DeVilla" Subject: Re: Re: FR: source code Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:21:35 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87bq7w5zp0.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> <87hchoh0tj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fxwyobc6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JEwyI-0004eo-R4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:21:38 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JEwyH-0004cf-6p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:21:38 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JEwyH-0004cU-37 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:21:37 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JEwyH-0003Uz-3J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:21:37 -0500 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so106935wah.10 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:21:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87fxwyobc6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Jan 15, 2008 6:36 PM, Bastien wrote: > I do agree with both reactions - I feel the same. But this was not > really the point I was trying to make. > > We already have these directives: > > ,---- > | #+BEGIN_HTML > | #+BEGIN_LaTeX > | #+BEGIN_TXT > | #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE > | #+BEGIN myblock > `---- I know. I don't care for these. There really only useful if you are exporting. (By that I mean they are ugly (in my opinion) in the org-buffer.) I just didn't want to see more of the same. I'd rather see a way to mark things up so they are meaningful in the buffer as well as export. I must admit though that there will be cases if you are doing some heavy publishing, like say a dissertation, you may need some special inlining. I may be a little quick on the knee jerk. In buffer markup recently got a little weaker and I'd like for it not to be over looked with the expectation that you can just use inline html or latex. Edd