From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eddward DeVilla" Subject: Re: depending TODOs, scheduling following TODOs automatically Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:39:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <6dbd4d000710080626i52f0f0t9354addc33c0efee@mail.gmail.com> <20071008134353.GA10774@odin.demosthenes.org> <877ilxmimn.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20071008202652.GA18426@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <87k5pxnicj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <29hcl0skmn.fsf@home.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IfGEw-00004s-1b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:39:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IfGEu-0008Tb-Dv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:39:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IfGEu-0008TQ-9x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:39:16 -0400 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.186]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IfGEt-0000AN-Sx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:39:16 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 19so1561294fkr for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 07:39:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <29hcl0skmn.fsf@home.net> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Richard G Riley Cc: John Wiegley , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 10/9/07, Richard G Riley wrote: > I'm interested in this. Why would an Org file with permissions like 700 > be any more virus friendly than an .emacs with the same permissions? Een > taking the windows case, a .emacs is executed each and every time, but > the org file only when loaded and acted upon. Perhaps it an over reaction on my part. I know the occasional org-file gets posted on this list. I'd like to see org catch on and see more info made available in org files. I don't normally send my .emacs file(s) to folks. That's my custom setup. (Though once in a while someone does copy it.) If org becomes popular enough that people pass data around in it, then it could be more of an issue. Especially since I think the triggers would be in drawers which are all always hidden unless you go and explicitly open each one. So you have hidden code in a powerful language. It's not very hidden and I know it not likely that org's format would catch on the way I'd like. Anyhow, I'm not saying don't do it. I just wanted to be sure it wasn't overlooked. Edd