From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: counter-intuitive key bindings Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 07:05:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ejisycqy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IJ0Da-0004qO-0R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2007 01:05:54 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IJ0DY-0004pQ-Fy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2007 01:05:53 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IJ0DY-0004pC-0d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2007 01:05:52 -0400 Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IJ0DX-0003Si-Gs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2007 01:05:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Jul 28, 2007, at 20:35, Leo wrote: > On 2007-07-28 12:43 +0100, Bastien wrote: >> Leo writes: >> >>> These key bindings are to move from one set of the TODO items to >>> another, which intuitively are a vertical motion. >> >> Well, I don't share this intuition. >> >> Since S- cycles through TODO states, it's consistent to >> use >> C-S- to cycle through TODO-states sets. >> >> And since S- changes the priority state, i guess >> C-S- >> could cycle through *priority-states sets* - if any. (I actually have >> no >> idea whether priority-states sets would be useful to someone.) > > In this case, I feel there should a consistent definition of key > bindings. One excellent example is vc, it is just so easy to remember. What do you mean with "consistent definition of key bindings". > I have been an regular user of org, and I have already forgotten that > S-up/down does priority change after one month's break. I have been trying very hard to make the key bindings as logical as possible - but there is a huge amount of commands in org, and many keys are needed. That said, the S-up/down for priorities does leas to a couple of inconsistencies, in particular between agenda and org-mode buffers. - Carsten > > -- > Leo (GPG Key: 9283AA3F) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > > -- Carsten Dominik Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek" Universiteit van Amsterdam Kruislaan 403 NL-1098SJ Amsterdam phone: +31 20 525 7477