From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Charles C. Berry" Subject: Re: #+BEGIN_html/#+END_html tags not exporting literally to html anymore? Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:38:11 -0700 Message-ID: References: <03f355f9d8a6478c816a612e156e2772@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <871t2l4v0y.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQdSt-0006NX-At for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:38:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQdSp-0002rz-VM for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:38:19 -0400 Received: from iport-acv4-out.ucsd.edu ([132.239.0.7]:42907) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQdSp-0002r3-MD for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:38:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Adam Aviv Cc: "Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Adam Aviv wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote: > >> >>> If so, is there a way to make compilation backwards compatible. I have >>> a lot of old org files that would be a pain to update. Further, all >>> the documentation on the org site is also out of date. >> >> a simple regex replace (or two I guess) will fix all in a file? > Better still `org-repair-export-blocks' will fix them. It can be found in the : *** New syntax for export blocks section of ORG-NEWS. > > Yes, I agree --- but that's a burden on long time users even if it is a > simple sed script. > > I just wonder why the #+BEGIN_HTML was removed in the first place? What > harm was it doing? As the ORG-NEWS section above notes, it fixes some parsing issues. > And, why was this change made without updating the documentation to > reflect it? > It is updated. For example, see (info "(org) Special blocks") and (info "(org) results") and in ORG-NEWS. Chuck