emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Charles C. Berry" <ccberry@ucsd.edu>
To: Org-Mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: make update2 and ob-comint.el bugs
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 18:57:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1604231830390.5914@charles-berrys-macbook.local> (raw)



Summary: ob-comint.elc compiled with `make update2' fails, but 
ob-comint.elc byte compiled via dired or with `emacs-lisp-byte-compile' 
succeeds.

===

I recently pushed a fix [1] for ob-comint.el or so I thought. See [2] for 
info on the bug.

First, I tested the fix on my own system by eval'ing ob-comint.el and 
running some tests (including `make test' FWIW).

I also byte-compiled the code using `dired-do-byte-compile', loaded that 
and ran more tests. All good.

Then I pushed that commit to master.

When I did `make update2' the compiled fixes did not work. But loading 
`ob-comint.el' works, and compiling via `dired-do-byte-compile' works and 
loading the result also works.

What?!

So I tried to undo the damage with two more commits, but in each case the 
`make update2' step generated code that was buggy.

I see that `make update2' uses `byte-recompile-directory' and indeed 
running that gives a different (larger) ob-comint.elc than does 
`dired-do-byte-compile'. But both eventually use `byte-compile-file', and 
AFAICS the optimization level is the same in both cases. So I am baffled.

Any advice on how to produce code that works when compiled with `make 
update2' or just to understand what gives here is appreciated.

Best,

Chuck

[1] commit e42454088ff1176cce9cc65a4bd1c6f17fe958ec
[2]<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/106557>

             reply	other threads:[~2016-04-24  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-24  1:57 Charles C. Berry [this message]
2016-04-24  3:19 ` make update2 and ob-comint.el bugs Charles C. Berry
2016-04-24  4:29   ` Charles C. Berry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.OSX.2.20.1604231830390.5914@charles-berrys-macbook.local \
    --to=ccberry@ucsd.edu \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).