From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: William Denton <wtd@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Trouble evaluating R source code blocks with C-c C-c
Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 10:27:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605281025120.13862@shell.miskatonic.org>
References: <2BE21056-50D3-49CE-8B0D-5467D182B7B5@agrarianresearch.org>
	<CA+M2ft8c6_6AekL6uwBxexTWUXnFFfBcoKXkHyn3SUYd6gD50g@mail.gmail.com>
	<2E8B017B-F4AB-454D-81A1-E61F55F4F958@agrarianresearch.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40515)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wtd@pobox.com>) id 1b6fDk-0000rY-HL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2016 10:28:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wtd@pobox.com>) id 1b6fDf-0005Rs-Dn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2016 10:28:07 -0400
Received: from shell.miskatonic.org ([65.39.236.119]:43770)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wtd@pobox.com>) id 1b6fDf-0005RS-9j
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2016 10:28:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <2E8B017B-F4AB-454D-81A1-E61F55F4F958@agrarianresearch.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Vikas Rawal <vikaslists@agrarianresearch.org>
Cc: org-mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On 28 May 2016, Vikas Rawal wrote:

> Thanks John. Appreciate that you cared to respond to such a vague query. I am 
> at a loss with this one. It does not happen all the time. I think it happens 
> when I am processing large datasets, and CPUs and RAM of my system are 
> struggling to keep up. But I could be wrong.

I've had the same kind of thing happen---but C-g (sometimes many) to kill the 
command, then rerunning, usually works without any trouble.  Some strange 
combination of CPU and RAM and all that, the kind of thing that's not easily 
reproducible.

Relatedly, sometimes if I have ":results output" for one block and then 
":results values" for the next one, the second block picks up the output from 
the first one.  But then other times not!  Seems to depend on how intensive the 
R work is.

Bill
-- 
William Denton :: Toronto, Canada :: https://www.miskatonic.org/
Caveat lector.