From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jude DaShiell Subject: Re: git useage question Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 09:27:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTDMQ-0007Yq-NS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 09:27:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTDMN-00009U-EC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 09:27:22 -0400 Received: from shellworld.net ([69.60.117.94]:58093 helo=server1.shellworld.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTDMN-00006p-BO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 09:27:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rustom Mody Cc: emacs-orgmode uemacs is not microemacs those are two entirely different products and Daniel Lawrence was responsible for microemacs. Not only that for screen reader users in dos, uemacs wrote to the screen incorrectly and too fast for screen readers to speak. On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Rustom Mody wrote: > Jude DaShiell wrote: > > The only place microemacs might be by now could be some orphan version of > the simtel archives. Taken down but last I > > knew not entirely removed from the internet. > > Does not seem to match the data here > http://git.kernel.org/?p=editors/uemacs/uemacs.git;a=summary > Note the dates (and the owner) >