From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jude DaShiell Subject: Re: git useage question Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 18:32:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <21955.1307225496@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49443) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSzOV-0005hY-Aq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:32:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSzOS-0006MI-Qi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:32:35 -0400 Received: from shellworld.net ([69.60.117.94]:54427 helo=server1.shellworld.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSzOS-0006M5-C8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:32:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <21955.1307225496@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nick Dokos Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Compare that documentation with the documentation written for micro-emacs, that should give you an idea what I mean by reasonable documentation. Also, thanks for the faq pointers. On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Nick Dokos wrote: > Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > I wouldn't be writing this if the documentation were reasonable. Once > > org-mode gets cloned, how is git properly used to update the cloned > > instance on a machine? > > > > What's unreasonable about the doc? > > If you don't have any local changes, see > > http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#sec-3_2 > > If you *do* have local changes, see > > http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#sec-3_3 > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > >