From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard G Riley Subject: Re: Mail files in org Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:45:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20080828145858.GD23058@thinkpad.adamsinfoserv.com> <20080828153827.GE23058@thinkpad.adamsinfoserv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KYjh7-0004Uk-LT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:45:57 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KYjh6-0004UF-Ko for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:45:56 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47042 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KYjh6-0004UC-7e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:45:56 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]:61945) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KYjh5-0003TE-Tz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:45:56 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so276508fgb.30 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:45:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080828153827.GE23058@thinkpad.adamsinfoserv.com> (Russell Adams's message of "Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:38:27 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Russell Adams writes: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 05:10:46PM +0200, Richard G Riley wrote: >> >> This already works if you use Gnus. > > I adore emacs, but I haven't been sold into it for mail. I used Pine a > decade ago, and moved to Mutt. I like its interface and maildir > support. Gnus supports maildir too although recently I moved to an IMAP server which accesses the maildir format created with procmail on my mail server. I did use Mutt for a while but being an emacs user I took the plunge and went Gnus and never looked back. All the things you are familiar with integrate nicely (flyspell, org-mode etc). And, of course, Gnus merges the concept of usenet and email which is great when you get it all sorted out and configured to your liking. But now its starting to sound like I am pimping Gnus. But as an emacs user I would recommend you take the plunge again and retry Gnus. > > I haven't compared it to Gnus in a while, but I'd prefer to just link > to a message than change clients. :-;