From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: in-buffer settings for priorities Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 16:35:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq8yZ-0004Zk-QT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 10:35:07 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq8yY-0004Ya-2Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 10:35:07 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq8yX-0004YX-VS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 10:35:06 -0400 Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hq8yX-0000Yd-Fk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 10:35:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Dmitri Minaev Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On May 21, 2007, at 15:11, Dmitri Minaev wrote: > copying to the list: > > Thank you. I thought about using sorting strategy to sort by tags, but > the requirement that the score must be the last tag has stopped me. I > like the approach you describe, but it still has some deficiencies. > First, any tag not included in the set of the pre-defined tags breaks > the order of tags making the score to appear before this tag. Second, > I would say that it's more visually pleasing to have the rating in a > fixed place, separate from tags. The idea of priorities itself fits > the task better, IMHO. You can certainly use priorities, even though for now it is letters. I am not sure yet about the changes you propose, will need more time to think about this. > BTW, after upgrade to 4.74, I noticed a couple of things: > > 1. When the state of an item changes from nothing to the first in the > TODO sequence, no note is taken and the state change is not logged. Is > this by design? Yes. > > 2. When I run org-tags-sparse-tree with a regexp like {score[X-Y]}, > the resulting tree includes one and only one item with the score less > than X. I simplified the tree and .emacs as much as possible and even > the example as simple as the one below still demonstrates this > behaviour: > > * qwer > ** qwer :score9: > ** asdf :score7: > ** zxcv :score5: > ** nmkj :score7: > ** poi :score4: Check out the variable org-show-following-heading, and its companions org-show-hierarchy-above and org-show-siblings.