From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uPspMWFnqV/NdAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 15:59:29 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id OCbyLGFnqV9CIwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 15:59:29 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73C2594051F for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47632 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kc9Zo-0005XR-DS for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:59:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kc9Xm-0003mI-FH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:57:22 -0500 Received: from grinta.net ([109.74.203.128]:43952) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kc9Xk-0007MW-Mz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:57:22 -0500 Received: from black.local (guests.bs.ptb.de [192.53.103.10]) (Authenticated sender: daniele) by grinta.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E70AEDAA1 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:57:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=grinta.net; s=2020; t=1604937439; bh=GeO6lynbjZdcPVzPNsSRQDacrtspU7GsxTE89bZrxuo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=YEjmUtvuRBhecm0jSjJej/whGbYs0Z2yRg3BBfpmRlOupTBwYcIYLpZ/rmsmiGtAT vyRstSwYKb4BULpDtIjG+VOY5DJmUOqigJZKVJvD47pOmq2OBj/8WiR6OKurgLLcVN zOgWhcsz6gRdCxHmlcS6EWn2uG6bC5ZldMXAGrRHhOQWBSatpYPNOJWMxwa0wCZBHb HEGiX9IdtZsOLmWTI3MjOe5cqTz+EfRbqVbYPd16LzTxozJ824JYc1VoPL6KXL8mj3 55WXcHxrZJwd6c5P/tUIaLpX5yPSCQEZYJUV8ZCmFxUB+OwXcbhZ9mLSmAGB45IamX 4MjFFJpfB0y1A== Subject: Re: Thoughts on the standardization of Org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org References: <20201101161317.GA6609@maokai> <87imaoekrz.fsf@web.de> <39fb1f8d-4407-9359-ad14-72ae7841fda9@grinta.net> <87tuu85djy.fsf@gmail.com> From: Daniele Nicolodi Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 16:57:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=109.74.203.128; envelope-from=daniele@grinta.net; helo=grinta.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/09 10:53:53 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=grinta.net header.s=2020 header.b=YEjmUtvu; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: 8mOiRiNKfE6N On 09/11/2020 15:04, Maxim Nikulin wrote: > 2020-11-08 Jean Louis wrote: >> That is right, I am using it since years in ~/.mailcap that works well >> for mutt email client. >> >> text/org; emacsclient %s; nametemplate=%s.org; >> text/x-org; emacsclient %s; nametemplate=%s.org; > > Just for curiosity, couldn't it lead to execution of arbitrary code > placed into elisp table expressions, some macro, etc.? I have not > convinced myself that just opening of a file (without executing of src > blocks) is safe enough and there no dangerous #+startup options or other > tricks. Emacs is too powerful and too flexible... As far as I know it is not any more dangerous than opening any other file with Emacs. Why do you think the fact that the file extension is ".org" instead of something else makes a relevant difference? Cheers, Dan