From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Org-mode version 5.17 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:40:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JEmy2-0000xz-CX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:40:42 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JEmy0-0000ub-Rx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:40:42 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JEmy0-0000uS-O3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:40:40 -0500 Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.238]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JEmy0-0001uW-Ht for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:40:40 -0500 Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 23so968625huc.1 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:40:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Dec 20, 2007, at 11:36 PM, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote: > > Hi Carsten, > > "Carsten Dominik" writes: > >> - When the new option `org-refile-use-outline-path' is set, >> refile targets will be presented like a file path to the >> completion interface: "level 1/level 2/level 3". This >> may be the fastest interface yet to get to a certain >> outline entry. Do we need to use this interface in other >> places? Thanks to Jose Ruiz for this proposal. > > Thanks again. I've been playing with this new feature and it's really > as useful as i imagined. One related idea just occurred to me: i think > it'd be nice to be able to specify a non-existent leaf at the prompt, > in which case a node with the requested path would be created and the > refile would take place (as a child of the new node). Would that be > difficult to implement? It would not be difficult but error-prone. And it would not be clear *where* the new node should be created. I am not taking any action for now on this. - Carsten