From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:53:06 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86sk7gooh2.fsf@portan.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> <3E3E058D-6BBD-4D9B-845D-3E13235EF0DC@gmail.com> <4BB3973D.3090305@comcast.net> <9667B267-935B-4DFB-800B-FC76DBCCBF28@gmail.com> <8739z8g3ul.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NzA9S-0006g4-By for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:53:14 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46927 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzA9Q-0006ew-NE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:53:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzA9N-0000dX-DH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:53:12 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com ([209.85.219.214]:52737) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzA9N-0000cv-8L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:53:09 -0400 Received: by mail-ew0-f214.google.com with SMTP id 6so193371ewy.32 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:53:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8739z8g3ul.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Karsten Heymann Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Karsten, On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Karsten Heymann wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > a small note: > > Carsten Dominik writes: > [...] >> If you have customized the variable org-export-latex-classes, you >> need >> to remove the following lines from each class definition: >> >> \usepackage[AUTO]{inputenc} >> \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} >> \usepackage{graphicx} >> \usepackage{longtable} >> \usepackage{float} >> \usepackage{wrapfig} >> \usepackage{soul} >> \usepackage{latexsym} >> \usepackage{amssymb} >> \usepackage{hyperref} Do you have any recommendations for the sequence in which these packages should be called? Or does that make no difference at all? Does any of these cause problems if they are called twice (say I add them, but users have them configured already?) > > The following packages should also be safe to add, as they are part of > the standard latex distribution: > > textcomp (better Text symbols, for example list bullets not made of > math > chars, are used automatically if package is loaded) > fixltx2e (numerous small slightly backwards incompatible changes, see > http://ctan.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/fixltx2e.html) > > Also, I'd recommend \usepackage{microtype} and a gentle increase of > the > \tolerance value (less perfectionist text justification) for a much > nicer out-of-the-box experience: What is is really changing due to these last two settings (microtype) and tolerance, could you explain in a bit more detail? And: Can I expect fixltx2e to be present in all distributions? Is \tolerance defined in microtype, or did you put these together just incidentally? > > \usepackage{microtype} > \tolerance=1000 > > Yours > Karsten I really appreciate expert advice about this. Thank you. - Carsten