Re: [PATCH] export to various flavors of (X)HTML

[Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>]

Hi Eric, Rick, Francois and others,

Nicolas commented to me about this patch that he was wondering if it
would not be better to have a separate backend for html5, i.e.
ox-html5.el that could be derived from ox-html.el and make it easier
in the future to build it out to take full advantage of html5 features.
I think he has a point, and I would like to hear your comments.

Thanks

- Carsten

On 2.5.2013, at 23:07, Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> wrote:

> Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com> writes:
> 
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:26:52PM -0700, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>>> Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com> writes:
>>> 
>>>> Whoops. Wrong key. Patch actually attached to this email...
>>>> rick
>>> 
>>> Great, I'll consolidate all these -- would it be better to mush them
>>> into one big patch, or to keep them separate (I suppose for ease of
>>> rollback, if something goes wrong)?
>> 
>> Probably squashing them into one patch would be the best. But Carsten
>> or Bastien might disagree :).
>> 
>> rick
> 
> Okay, there it is: one big patch (including your xml declaration fix).
> 
> I didn't add any more refined handling of the html5-fancy option. As a
> second-order option it didn't seem worthy of an #+OPTIONS entry, and I
> didn't bother checking for an empty string, either. It can always be
> #+BINDed if necessary, and if it ever annoys anyone I can fix it
> further.
> 
> E
> 
> <0001-ox-html.el-Export-to-different-X-HTML-flavors-includ.patch>