From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: org-capture (lost PATCH?) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:45:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <81hbha3arh.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocbi4n41.fsf@fastmail.fm> <81d3ryv5v5.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48359 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P0S4o-0007Gz-Nj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:46:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0S4n-0005q8-9A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:46:02 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:55655) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0S4n-0005q0-2l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:46:01 -0400 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so135824ewy.0 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:46:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <81d3ryv5v5.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Cc: Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Jambunathan K wrote: > Matt > >>> I had proposed a patch to org-capture in this thread. >>> >>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-08/ >>> msg01152.html >>> >>> The patch has neither been rejected nor accepted. I am a bit >>> concerned >>> that it might have been lost. >> >> It's currently on patchwork with the status of "deferred": >> >> http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/246/ > > Thanks. > > Reassuring to know that this is still under the radar. No really. The message with the patch did state this: > > The intention of this mail is to share my notes and influence you to > considering adding the needed support in the core. In effect the > attached patch is demo-only and not to be construed as a formal > commit request. There was no further discussion of the patch in the mailing group, no followup or support. ANd I have not yet spent the time to really understand what this was all about. - Carsten > > From the patchwork server side, two things could be considered: > > 1. Enhance the web interface[1] to show *all* *not DONE* items. > > - http://patchwork.newartisans.com/project/org-mode/list/ > > 2. Generate an automated reply to a submitter of the patch giving > him an > URL to the patch. This will enable under the hood access to the > patch > state. > > Either or both of 1 and 2 would avoid anxiety on contributor's side > particularly the newer ones. > > Thanks, > Jambunathan K.