From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Leech-Pepin Subject: Re: [RFC] Dog food, anyone? Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:05:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87efntod73.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878tdyjoti.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRRtE-00024E-W2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:05:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRRtA-0002lN-Tq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:05:40 -0500 Received: from mail-vk0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22e]:34965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRRtA-0002kf-Ok for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:05:36 -0500 Received: by mail-vk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id o73so239242vkd.2 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:05:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <878tdyjoti.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org Mode List Hello, On December 19, 2017 6:11:21 PM EST, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >Hello, > >Jonathan Leech-Pepin writes: > >> As Thomas mentioned I had originally written the exporter=2E =20 > >I know=2E You are credited as the author of ox-texinfo=2Eel=2E Did I ment= ion >otherwise? > It had partially sounded like you were saying both the backend and the wor= k on manual=2Eorg were his=2E Might just have been a misinterpretation thou= gh=2E >> I'd done my best to get it to work with the majority of the org=2Etexi >> however there were certain features that did not seem to be present >at >> the time in Org (or at least no convenient method to simulate them >> without macros)=2E > >Just to prevent miscommunication, I wasn't criticizing your work when >I wrote I had improved the back-end=2E > I didn=E2=80=99t take it as criticism, when I=E2=80=99d started working on= it the new export engine was still in it=E2=80=99s infancy and a lot of th= e work you=E2=80=99ve done to improve performance and parsing hadn=E2=80=99= t occurred yet=2E I=E2=80=99m glad it was complete enough to let Thomas st= art his work and give you a basis for improving to allow for a full manual= =2E >Regards, --=20 Jonathan