From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@uva.nl>
Subject: Re: Sticky Agenda buffer: Announcement and request for testing
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:58:11 +0200
Message-ID: <EB0CC83D-DDAD-4B4D-986C-054F8C9EDF90@uva.nl>
References: <65860CF1-3D9B-497B-8EF7-AA7E87B28BEE@uva.nl>
	<87mx6ts7kb.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36205)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1SExhP-0002WX-44
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 02:58:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1SExhN-00032M-Aa
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 02:58:38 -0400
Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:47545)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1SExhN-00032B-22
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 02:58:37 -0400
Received: by eeke53 with SMTP id e53so1029739eek.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87mx6ts7kb.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien Guerry <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, "Dominik,
	Carsten" <C.Dominik@uva.nl>

Hi Bastien,

of course this is how I'd like it to work as well, but this was too hard =
for the moment... :(

On Apr 3, 2012, at 7:33 AM, Bastien bzg@gnu.org wrote:

> Hi Carsten and Max,
>=20
> "Dominik, Carsten" <C.Dominik@uva.nl> writes:
>=20
>> already in Januar, Max Mikhanosha had published the first
>> version of his code to implement multiple agenda buffers.  I have
>> worked with him over the last few weeks, and we think that
>> it is now quite stable.
>=20
> I've been trying the agenda-sticky branch a few times now and I love
> this feature -- thanks a lot!
>=20
> One request: I often use buffer restrictions in combination with =
agenda
> views.  For example, I restrict to a first-level tree then run my =
daily
> agenda on that tree.
>=20
> In this case, using sticky agenda is a bit confusing because I expect=20=

> a completely different agenda view while using the same agenda key =
(none
> of the items in a tree are part of another subtree.)
>=20
> Could we have an option allowing a set of rules (or a set of agenda
> views) for which we want the rebuilding to be done automatically?  I
> would turn on this for my daily agenda views.
>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> --=20
> Bastien