>arthur miller writes: > >>>> Well, part of it. Or more to make some parts of org-markup configurable, and >>>> usable as minor modes so they can be easier used outside of org-mode. >>> >>>This is not the direction Org mode project is going. We do the reverse - >>>Org markup is getting more stable, with the aim to simplify developing >>>third-party parsers and eventually registering Org syntax in IANA MIME db. >> >> I am not subscribed to mailing lists due to lots of trafic going on there, so >> I >> am not overly introduced in directions in which org goes, so forgive me if I >> am >> not so familiar with the latest features. > >Sorry, I did not intend my comment to sound personal. I just explained >why configurable markup is not something I see as a good idea. No worries; I didn't took it personally at all; I was just letting you know I am not very up-to date with latest development, and where Org is going, if I suggest something that is diagonally opposite to Org development. ________________________________ Från: Ihor Radchenko Skickat: den 31 augusti 2024 14:20 Till: arthur miller Kopia: emacs-devel@gnu.org ; emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Ämne: Re: Sv: Sv: Modularizing Org as GSoC project (was: New Emacs features via Google Summer of Code (or other similar stipend schemes) (was: as for Calc and the math library)) arthur miller writes: >>> Well, part of it. Or more to make some parts of org-markup configurable, and >>> usable as minor modes so they can be easier used outside of org-mode. >> >>This is not the direction Org mode project is going. We do the reverse - >>Org markup is getting more stable, with the aim to simplify developing >>third-party parsers and eventually registering Org syntax in IANA MIME db. > > I am not subscribed to mailing lists due to lots of trafic going on there, so I > am not overly introduced in directions in which org goes, so forgive me if I am > not so familiar with the latest features. Sorry, I did not intend my comment to sound personal. I just explained why configurable markup is not something I see as a good idea. > Well, yes something like that; make features available outside of org-mode, and > make org-mode use those features instead of having everything in a monolithical > library. > ... To conclude, we may use these ideas for GSoC projects, but maybe separately. I doubt that "modularizing" in general would be a reasonable task to finish within summer. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at