From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id WGYwKgmp4l7+WQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 21:58:33 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 8H8PJgmp4l6gDwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 21:58:33 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E323E9409DD for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 21:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42062 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jjVDT-0005hw-J0 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 17:58:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jjVD0-0005hh-Bo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 17:58:02 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:58755 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jjVCw-0005OI-Ov for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 17:58:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mathworks.com; s=mimecast20180117; t=1591912676; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hWeIKNZzFI4QKYGD5K7egBFtWROTf04go+VrowTZ8SA=; b=adgvZkfH+/zSq5KfGlkOz+EpjtJQsuF0Z71k1ARu9VxeOuVGkqYRRiqBiQInmDiDDBcLaj TJYsTNSJH8ByJWSUsk7RvQxpFdyDYI/X6cG5astOPvKLs1TSN3hykZgEwsyavstsZymVcX mDrKiMJ1o6WxQwey6ZuAxXha5zNedT8= Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12lp2168.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.59.168]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-233-Jre6CJsnPOqRlrvhDd9b7w-1; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 17:57:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Jre6CJsnPOqRlrvhDd9b7w-1 Received: from DM6PR05MB6764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:1ff::13) by DM6PR05MB7017.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:1de::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3088.9; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 21:57:51 +0000 Received: from DM6PR05MB6764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8c2f:48df:345b:3645]) by DM6PR05MB6764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8c2f:48df:345b:3645%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.010; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 21:57:51 +0000 From: John Ciolfi To: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Bug: Option to disable evaluation of code blocks during export [9.3.7 (9.3.7-dist @ /PATH/TO/org/install/emacs/site-lisp/org/)] Thread-Topic: Bug: Option to disable evaluation of code blocks during export [9.3.7 (9.3.7-dist @ /PATH/TO/org/install/emacs/site-lisp/org/)] Thread-Index: AQHWQCpJYdIcr25GOU6KjySQuv19NqjT7jiugAAGRzQ= Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 21:57:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: , <87wo4di96o.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> In-Reply-To: <87wo4di96o.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [73.4.32.87] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f43cb332-6c95-42e4-9875-08d80e527ccf x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR05MB7017: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000; x-forefront-prvs: 0431F981D8 x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: HQihiwNlfNZN1X1Tl9YBRYAwWI1pRWjeyNrrOWlDvzCnHvAMO35l5DCTM2y8Kgt/WnVAs+kwyV8SrTLoQnkk+S2daYw+vdAPWMyECARJ6ZObW3y9+iNJ5LQ38uQ5dJhn+C0z0kvOkkNKnuxTk9NYxE4MaVfGqJd95PIBkRELq/kDgyffw6l2fPU6JeaCjUlkmm9tbdORpYeHKs/hvsB7bvT1YiqDL6IAqY8X2FRTgrhM57UbVhFjH1uviwr43DiDGG3v9mKB8tKZW+65o2bXvFnk7iAmcEtUIr6II5b0Yh25b1ffO2FSYmd9PCxrTuyYch0gbX/YRKOZBGtrja7uWw== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR05MB6764.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(376002)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(366004)(55016002)(83380400001)(33656002)(5660300002)(8676002)(4326008)(8936002)(186003)(316002)(2906002)(52536014)(7696005)(19627405001)(86362001)(53546011)(6506007)(26005)(9686003)(66446008)(64756008)(66946007)(6916009)(71200400001)(66556008)(76116006)(66476007)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: yFRyr3Q8bmutq/PiZWc8orQQn6I8bjTCEI7SVX5ybzUWL8jaH/RKJDw0IzDKq9B0ZEyQ8+Zy3420TCZcA+z7lrAjafL0eqL6eDsZGvmTkIJPyuMkK9BV5Mkfg76W3vF1G2/50uIwqm8BCpFV1OU2WgxZZU3lAecIKmVJQZpqyrsRxEbHD2t3eQT7Wvo8R4SJ2o+QmXqSvv1fGQYDJv6QdjtTTnmMbIuZEvmpy1xUIv24wMoEnchqt6iUyAf/2+fH1R+LQlRzmW9CWMX0uCYaX8ttPQ7r8zeb9bKwvzSW9/FCvvVx8zlRXq3gq2qssUmrcbt6VYFEQ9P8z8UBdvifj9XYuXU7ovoIfQ3EH1ToK9OJNBnFu7UeQkgHABSorJXS3g5NOSdLPlnA+RgasAjcMF5QOf9xqPd11/qXQMmOsQwaoAh3QOJtFLyCkiJuHI1ApnQcgwaSQQ8SRb9jr+4vo82dcAKJjxnTpkmZmE6F65Y= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: mathworks.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f43cb332-6c95-42e4-9875-08d80e527ccf X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Jun 2020 21:57:51.6212 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 99dd3a11-4348-4468-9bdd-e5072b1dc1e6 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: oImCbysNb9D6wtb47Y3YKu93eosZ1OoDpIoHjx8/RLGdlc0RglU4hVW0N0KQEWNtH46MLI061qlMjrJxf+5MyA== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR05MB7017 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: mathworks.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR05MB6764AE108FCFF28396CB3A2AD1800DM6PR05MB6764namp_" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.120; envelope-from=ciolfi@mathworks.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/11 17:57:56 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=mathworks.com header.s=mimecast20180117 header.b=adgvZkfH; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: EDBIKoZfP4vy --_000_DM6PR05MB6764AE108FCFF28396CB3A2AD1800DM6PR05MB6764namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It would be very nice if I could enable/disable the evaluation of code bloc= ks during the export process in the interactive C-c C-e environment. I do now see that I can use the :eval no-export header more effectively, so= this is less of an issue, but still think it would be a nice enhancement t= o have control from within the interactive org-export-dispatch function. Thanks John ________________________________ From: Nicolas Goaziou Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 5:28 PM To: John Ciolfi Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Bug: Option to disable evaluation of code blocks during export= [9.3.7 (9.3.7-dist @ /PATH/TO/org/install/emacs/site-lisp/org/)] Hello, John Ciolfi writes: > Could you add an option to disable evaluation of code blocks when exporti= ng? If I > have an org-file with many code blocks setup for evaulation (babel), when= I export, I get > prompted for every code block. Also the prompt does not clearly show whic= h code block it's > asking to evaluate. What is wrong with :eval no-export header? You can set it globally, file-wise, tree wise, or per block. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou --_000_DM6PR05MB6764AE108FCFF28396CB3A2AD1800DM6PR05MB6764namp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It would be very nice if I could enable/disable the evaluation of code bloc= ks during the export process in the interactive C-c C-e environment. <= /div>

I do now see that I can use the :eval no-export header more effectively, so= this is less of an issue, but still think it would be a nice enhancement t= o have control from within the interactive org-export-dispatch function.

Thanks
John
From: Nicolas Goaziou <m= ail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 5:28 PM
To: John Ciolfi <ciolfi@mathworks.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Bug: Option to disable evaluation of code blocks during= export [9.3.7 (9.3.7-dist @ /PATH/TO/org/install/emacs/site-lisp/org/)]
 
Hello,

John Ciolfi <ciolfi@mathworks.com> writes:

> Could you add an option to disable evaluation of code blocks when expo= rting? If I
> have an org-file with many code blocks setup for evaulation (babel), w= hen I export, I get
> prompted for every code block. Also the prompt does not clearly show w= hich code block it's
> asking to evaluate.

What is wrong with :eval no-export header? You can set it globally,
file-wise, tree wise, or per block.

Regards,

--
Nicolas Goaziou

--_000_DM6PR05MB6764AE108FCFF28396CB3A2AD1800DM6PR05MB6764namp_--