From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: [Patch] M-Right and M-Left behave differently on headings and list items Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:54:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: <42881A23-3B5E-4423-B068-F543CE5B6AA7@gmail.com> <87ljchrkwp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O4aNz-0002RX-CZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:54:39 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48358 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O4aNx-0002OJ-Fx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:54:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4aNq-0007Ix-6U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:54:35 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com ([209.85.219.214]:62479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4aNp-0007IW-VK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:54:30 -0400 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so2478434ewy.32 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:54:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ljchrkwp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Matti De Craene On Apr 21, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Bastien wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> do others agree with Matti's view? > > FWIW, I do. There is still another difference. Currently, when I execute the indentation command several times in a row, the range to which this applies is locked. So for example" - level 1a - level 2a - level 2b - level 2c - level 1b If I now go on level 1a and use M-S-left, level 1b becomes a sibling of 2c. If I immediately after this do M-S-right, 1b should be indented along with 2c, but this does not happen because the item range is locked. If, however, you do something in between, like moving the cursor by one character, 1b will be included. I believe I did this a long time ago, because I felt that not locking the range for commands in direct succession would too quickly modify the structure, including at places outside of the current view ( beyond the window end) If you are calling for more consistency, maybe this "feature" should go as well? - Carsten