From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Installing org-mode on ms-dos an Emacs 20.05 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:27:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87odc9pr9y.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAMML-0005p2-Ne for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:27:29 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAMMJ-0005o0-M8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:27:29 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAMMJ-0005nq-En for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:27:27 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAMMJ-0004qF-41 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:27:27 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so2996713ugf.48 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 01:27:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87odc9pr9y.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Paul Raestad On Dec 29, 2007, at 2:24 PM, Bastien wrote: > "Paul Raestad" writes: > >> I'm trying to install org-mode on an old ms-dos pc without much luck. >> Installing Emacs 20.05 went quite well, but installing org-mode 5.17 >> on top of it gives me all kinds of errors. > > As Leo said, maybe the best solution is to install Emacs 22. > > But IIRC there is a directory in http://orgmode.org where you can find > older versions of Org. Is there something like this Carsten? Some day there will be a mercurial repository with old versions, but Emacs 20 is unlikely to ever be an acceptable host. - Carsten