From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Question: org-remember and level>1 target headline [resent] Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:54:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4BE84503.3020008@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <4BE920E9.5090109@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <4BEC1F46.10205@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> <0F371155-B899-48C1-8D57-5F753807C19B@gmail.com> <4BFE3EB5.6020709@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49733 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OR30J-000863-TA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:55:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR30I-0003V9-KW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:55:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:43285) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR30I-0003Uz-FO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:55:02 -0400 Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so3745771wyf.0 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 05:55:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BFE3EB5.6020709@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Martin Pohlack Cc: org-mode Hi Martin, I am rejecting this patch, but only because because I think this issue is taken care of in org-capture.el Let me know if you do not agree. Cheers, and thanks for your contribution! - Carsten On May 27, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Martin Pohlack wrote: > [resending to get into the patch tracker] > > Hi, > > On 15.05.2010 08:42, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> On May 14, 2010, at 5:42 AM, Samuel Wales wrote: >>> On 2010-05-13, Martin Pohlack wrote: >>>> Is there interest to define remember targets via paths or via ID? >>> >>> ID would be useful, I think. >> >> ID certainly - path could be useful to avoid ambiguities. > > Please find attached a first version of a patch adding support for IDs > as remember targets. > > Feedback welcome. > > Cheers, > Martin > - Carsten