From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: BUG: in org-refile Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:48:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87sl0pwmlj.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JHjzS-0005AJ-5H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:06:22 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JHjzR-00058u-7f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:06:21 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHjzQ-00058U-RX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:06:20 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JHjzQ-0005Ky-Cl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:06:20 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so582828nfh.26 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:06:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87sl0pwmlj.fsf@web.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jost Burkardt Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Jost, thanks for the nice report. On Jan 22, 2008, at 10:56 PM, Jost Burkardt wrote: > Hi, > > org-refile seems to have problems, when there are similar headings > with > similar nams in different trees. This is now fixed, with the drawback that Emacs will now visit and create buffers for all files that are possible refile candidates. Previously I removed the corresponding buffers to avoid creating many buffers. But now I just keep them, and make sure that accurate positions are maintained and found. In particular, I re-create the full table of refile targets for each call of the command. This could be potentially a bit slower, but it is safer this way, and gets rid of the need to update the target table by hand. > By the way, do you think it would be possible to use org-refile to > just > to go to a target position - maybe with a prefix C-u (just like > org-remember). I very much like the minibuffer-movement-interface, and > it would definetly help in finding item's, which were "filed away" :-) The comparison with `org-remember' is a valid one, I am implementing it exactly as you have proposed, with a prefix arg. - Carsten